Showing posts with label Franz Kafka. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Franz Kafka. Show all posts

Thursday, July 3, 2014

July 3, 2014



July 3, 2014

“Dear World, I am leaving because I am bored. I feel I have lived long enough. I am leaving you with your worries in this sweet cesspool. Good luck. (George Sanders). ” As a suicide note, it’s a good one.  There is a touch of humor as well as his words that seems very true to the man.  Or at least, as part of an audience, we think of the note being true, or we wish to assume that’s the case.  For Sanders, due to his bad health, he couldn’t play his grand piano anymore.  So he dragged the piano outside his residence, and smashed it with an axe.  Which also sounds perfectly like what we imagine George Sanders would do if one is to be found in such a situation of despair.



The much underrated Michel Polnareff, also suffered from moments or years of despair.  Although he never leaped into the great unknown, he had demons he had to cope with, and with respect to his dear friend, and a figure who helped discover him, Lucien Morisse who committed suicide by using a firearm.  This started a downward spiral that in moments of clarity he got out to record, but eventually would lose himself in self-seclusion.   He suffered from defective eyesight throughout his life, but his sunglasses, which are not only an iconic visual for Poinareff, but were also used to hide the pain that he felt everyday as a performer.



I’m always intrigued by entertainers who not only entertain us, but also owing to their lifestyle or the choices they made, we the consumers or fans, follow them, like if we were the children following the Pied Piper of Hamelin.   Or on the other hand, we condemn them for their actions, which in reality, we don’t really know them.  We just read or see them in broad strokes, and that feeds our fantasy or what we believe to be right or wrong. Tom Cruise always strikes me as a figure that almost doesn’t exist, except in the minds of those who feel the need to condemn or judge another figure - and in most cases, that figure is usually an entertainer of some sort.



From day one, Tom Cruise appears to be an institution than a human being.  Like Polnareff hiding behind his dark sunglasses, Cruise hides behind his smile, which can be creepy or appears to be ‘fake. ' Nevertheless the irony is that he’s a very good actor who can use his body and facial emotions to great effect.  I have seen him in terrible films, but I think he himself has always been good.  When he’s in an exceptional film, he’s excellent.  Almost bone-chilling, good in fact.  Yet, due to his beliefs, we judge his life and therefore that leads one to judge his role as an entertainer or performer. “Performance” is a world that is not touched by the outside world. Yet it can be based on the actual arena that’s out there.  When one comes to a movie theater or concert, they have perceived ideas of what or who that performer is, and sometimes that works out OK, and in other times, it is not so hot.  Yet, one cannot count out the skills of a George Sanders, Polnareff, or our own (dis) loved Tom Cruise.



Culturally, I think we are in a world of our own making.  A system is set up where one can’t really contribute to the landscape that we live on.  Superficially we can do certain things, but the power base will never change. Or the structure of that power.  Even if there is a revolution, it will only mirror the previous institutions or structure.  Over the years, reading Kafka, I discovered that one is placed in a situation that we feel we are on the front lines to secede, but in reality the carrot will be moved inch-by-inch and we will never be able to reach our goal.  So perhaps George Sanders is correct in his suicide note, or better yet, surviving one’s world such as Tom Cruise.



There’s the world and there is the landscape that we can operate in.  The best we can do is focus on what we know, and what we want to know.  To wake up as a giant bug is one sort of awareness, but it is really depends on one’s point-of-view or not.  I think chance has a lot to do with it.  Sanders took a chance, and lost.  Polnareff is playing with the cards he has in his hands, and Cruise, like his name, is trying to maintain a level that is extremely high, but perhaps bound to fail due to human nature on his part, and others.  But it could be much more, you can be Julian Assange, trapped in an embassy in London.  But then again, perhaps we all make our own prisons, and we allow ourselves to be “guests’ in the prisons of our own making.

Tuesday, May 27, 2014

May 27, 2014



May 27, 2014

Throughout my life, I have been drawn to failure, as if it was a jar of honey, waiting for me to take the first taste.  Once tasted, I can’t get it out of my system, and the world of debacle, at least by my talent, takes it to the highest order.  Without a doubt, there is a gambler’s need to take a chance and throw it against the wall, to find out what will happen.   Of course, if you sit around a stir a big pot of honey, you will eventually get stun by a bee.



One of my favorite composers is a man who lived an exciting life, but yet, failed in many ways, with respect to producing and marketing his music: the French composer Louis Durey.   He made some beautiful music when he was an integral part of Jean Cocteau’s gang of composers “Les Six.” Their music was regarded as a reaction against the world of Richard Wagner and the impressionist music of Debussy and Ravel.   Also it was a process by which Cocteau to show his leadership abilities in organizing a group of musicians to do various projects.  It has been reported that Cocteau was very disappointed and angry about Durey not contributing to “Les mariés de la tour Eiffel, ” due to his claim, he didn’t feel well.  The truth of the matter was that Durey was not pleased to be in this band of musicians and composers.  He chose to work outside the then music world to be a member of the Communist party.  He participated in the French Resistance, and became a member of Fédération Musicale Populaire, where he wrote anti-fascist songs for the movement.

In the late 1950s and early 1960s, he became very much involved with the issue of Vietnam and the French occupation of that land.  Before anyone made an issue of the future Vietnam war, Durey wrote music to poems by Ho Chi Minh and Mao.  None of this music became popular and to this day, and it is very difficult, or almost impossible to locate.   Nevertheless, he did wander into a world where his music became unknown, and therefore he is very much a forgotten composer.  I think of him often, because I want my writing and my books to exist forever, but the truth is, very few people care about my literature.   I’m not sure how Franz Kafka felt about his works after his death, it has been indicated that he wanted all his writings to be burned, but his best friend Max Brod refused to do so. Also it is interesting how history portrays failure, because in his lifetime, Kafka saw himself as a very unsuccessful writer, while his friend, Brod, was quite a success in the literary world.  But now, it is Kafka whose works exist, and Brod is a footnote in Kafka’s shadow.



There is one writer who I admire greatly for his writings, although as a human, he may lack certain nice traits, is Louis-Ferdinand Céline.   At heart, an adventurer who took many chances in life to confront the horrors of the early 20th century.   Sadly, the results lead him to be strongly antisemitic, while at the same time was a brilliant stylist and narrative maker.  When one confronts the ugly beauty of Céline’s writing with the choices he made with regard to life, it is an uneasy relationship one has with the artist and his art.  On the other hand he has avoided a certain style of failure, in the cocktail formula of his ego, talent, and hatred for the human race.   The pitch-black humor of his work, makes his writings successful, even though there are areas one may not want to enter, but the nature of our landscape is often full of moral choices of all sorts, and therefore each person has to decide if they want to take that path or not.  Céline’s hatred of Jews was so extreme in his writings, even the Nazis wanted to distance themselves from his literature .  And to be fair, he was critical of Hitler as well, calling “Aryan baloney.” He even claimed at a dinner he was invited to at the German Embassy in Paris, that Hitler was dead and replaced by a Jewish double!  Perhaps he saw Charlie Chaplin’s “The Great Dictator?” Céline died in 1961, very much an outcast in mainstream culture, but beloved by the Beats as well as anyone who had an interest in literature that was extreme, dangerous, and in a funny way, beautiful.  In 1968, his home was burned, destroying his many unpublished manuscripts and of course, mementos.  But oddly enough, his parrot Toto survived the fire.



The dancer Isodore Duncan is also an artist who flirted with failure, but due to her talent and ego, she overcame the odds to become an icon in the 20th century.   Everything about her life was controversial, yet she was strong enough to ignore the criticism, and lead a life that was equally fascinating and forceful at the some time.  She was a woman who hated the commercial aspects of touring and even more so, the world of contracts. She felt that the “business” practice of doing art takes away the pleasure and focus of performing or making art. Her main goal in her work was to produce beauty and the education of the young - which included at the time, a very young Preston Sturges, but that’s another story all together.

Right now, in my life, I feel it can go either way for me.  My main focus has to be making art, no matter what becomes of me.  If the failure is in my cards or tea leaves, I must accept it, as a price for doing art.  Nevertheless, I have to admit, I do enjoy the journey to darkness, and whatever I find light at the end of the tunnel or just major disappointment, I need to take that trip at all costs.